Your Growth Partner for SEO & AI Search across Google, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot This time with results.

Most SEO agencies work toward rankings and traffic. We work toward pipeline and revenue. Everything that follows looks different because of that.

We optimize for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Grok the same way we optimize for Google, because that is where your buyers now research. We build content with your internal experts and customers instead of commissioning generic articles. And we report against revenue in your CRM, not rankings in a third-party tool.

It is rarely either/or. Almost every company we work with already has someone on this. Sometimes one person who owns organic next to three other jobs, sometimes a team of three. The question is not usually whether to hire, it is what those people should be spending their week on.

The person who owns organic internally usually spends most of the week coordinating. Chasing sign-off, briefing, following up on feedback, keeping four stakeholders aligned. Very little of it moves the number.

We take the production and the analysis. They keep the relationships, the internal decisions, and the judgment calls that need someone inside the company. That is not the same as replacing them. It is also the arrangement that works.

Building the whole capability in-house is a real option if you want to own it long term. It means staffing SEO, AI Search, content production, digital PR and conversion, which is three or four hires and a tooling budget, and most teams find the target arrives before the team does. If we think you would be better off hiring, we will say so on the first call.

We come to kick-off with a 3-month growth roadmap drawn from your audit data, so day one is execution, not "tell us about your product". The first 30 to 60 days are setup. We connect to your data, run interviews with your internal experts, and start shipping the first conversion improvements on pages that already get traffic. Conversion lifts usually show up inside this window.

AI citations start moving two to four weeks after structural fixes ship, tracked in Peec AI. Compounding pipeline lift from new organic surfaces shows up in months three to six. Growth Partnerships are scoped at twelve months with an opt-out after month six because the work compounds on that curve.

Two engagement models. A Project starts at €10,000 for a defined one-off: a bulk optimization of legacy content, a programmatic content build, an AI visibility assessment, or a custom scope. A Growth Partnership starts at €7,000 per month and scales with scope, with a twelve-month commitment and an opt-out after month six.

The initial audit is free. We do not offer a low-end retainer tier. If lowest price is the priority, we are not a fit. Exact scope and pricing come out of the 90-minute deep dive after we have looked at your actual surface area.

A Growth Partnership is staffed with a C-level strategic partner, a Team Lead for Organic Growth, a Senior Growth Strategist, a Senior Content Strategist, and a Senior Designer. Named people, not a pool. The strategists who plan your work also run it, and there is no account manager in between.

You reach them in a shared Slack or Teams channel rather than through a ticket queue.

AI does the heavy lifting underneath: pulling data, drafting briefs, surfacing opportunities, generating first-pass content from your expert interview transcripts. Every meaningful decision is made by a senior human, and every brief and every page passes through that team before it goes live.

Right, click data misses most of it. We pair three things to get a real picture, and we can set them up in about a day:

One: a GA4 custom channel group with the AI platform hostnames (chatgpt.com, perplexity.ai, gemini.google.com, copilot.microsoft.com, claude.ai, grok.x.ai). This catches the clicks that do happen.

Two: a required free-text "How did you hear about us?" field on every conversion form, auto-categorized into your CRM via Make.com or n8n plus the OpenAI API. Free-text beats dropdowns.

Three: a required "Verbal Source" CRM field that gates deal progression past discovery, plus optional Gong or Chorus keyword alerts so the AI tools mentioned on sales calls are captured too.

Together, these surface how AI Search actually contributes to pipeline, not just the slice that clicks reveal.

Out of all of it comes one headline metric: organic-sourced pipeline, attributed inside your CRM, broken down by page, query, channel, and ICP segment. The number we report is the same number your CFO sees. Underneath it we watch citation share across AI surfaces, conversion rate by page, and lifetime value by source.

No, and we would not trust an agency that did. Search behavior, AI model updates, and competitive pressure are not anyone's to control. What we commit to is how we work: weekly shipping, decisions tied back to your CRM, and the editorial standard on every piece we publish.

Where we set a target is on outcomes. Organic becomes a primary source of pipeline inside three to six months. If we are not on track, you see it in the same dashboard we do.

Most of it up front, very little after that. Onboarding is the expensive part for you: interviews with your product, sales, and support people, access to your data, and a few rounds of feedback while we learn what good sounds like in your category.

After that the goal is that you only review what you have to. You see what is coming in a shared dashboard, and in most companies the loop narrows to the calls that are genuinely yours to make. Most clients get there a few months in.

In regulated industries it does not narrow much, because factual and legal sign-off is not optional. We pace the roadmap to your review capacity instead of pretending it away.

The standing commitments are small: a shared Slack or Teams channel for async questions, bi-weekly strategy calls, and optional quarterly reviews in person.

We write it. Briefs, drafts, and final copy come from our content strategists, built on interviews with your internal experts rather than on what is already ranking.

On your own site we publish directly where we have CMS access, and that is what makes the pace possible. Where it is not possible, and in regulated industries it usually is not, we deliver into your workflow and your team publishes. We work that way with an insurer today.

On social we draft and you post. A LinkedIn post from your founder has to come from your founder's account, so we supply the copy and the angle and your people press publish.

No paid media. We integrate signals from your paid platforms because they tell us what buyers actually want and which offers convert, but we do not run paid campaigns ourselves. We work alongside your in-house paid team.

Digital PR is in scope, because off-site citations are one of the strongest levers for both AI Search visibility and traditional rankings. We work from data first. We build a campaign around proprietary data you already own, an external dataset we shape into a story, or a new study we run together. We handle the narrative, the visuals, on-site publication, distribution across your owned social channels, and direct outreach to publishers in your category. The output is real coverage that earns lasting citations, not press releases nobody reads.

Yes. Read-only access in most cases. We connect to HubSpot or Salesforce, GA4 or your equivalent, Google and Meta ad platforms, your customer support tool, and any community or call-recording tool you use. We sign a DPA and use the minimum access needed.

If we cannot see the data, we cannot optimize for revenue. We can start without full access, but the recommendations are weaker until the picture is complete.

Yes, and we would rather plan around it than be surprised by it. We work inside review chains today, including one at an insurer where every article passes subject-matter specialists, legal, and brand before it goes live.

What that changes: we write to your legal guidelines from the brief rather than after the first round, we track which corrections came back so the same one is never made twice, and we pace the roadmap to your review capacity rather than to ours. Comparison content against named competitors is a legal question before it is a marketing one, so we bring the draft and the reasoning instead of the finished page.

The same applies to access. If your CMS is closed to outsiders, we deliver into your workflow. If your CRM is, we build the reporting from what we can see. One client runs four languages this way, written per market rather than translated.

We work with them. That is the normal case, not the exception: most of our clients have one to three people who already own this, and the point is to make those people faster rather than redundant.

The split is usually ours to produce and analyse, theirs to decide and to carry internally. We can also go the other way and hand you strategy, briefs and editorial review while your team writes. Both work. What matters is that it is agreed in week one rather than discovered in month three.

What does not work is being placed as a vendor below an in-house team, with no line to the people who set the strategy. The work depends on the strategy and the execution being on the same page.

We write both. A translated page reads like one, and it misses the queries people actually type in the second market. Those are rarely the same queries.

Each market gets its own research and its own copy. Where a piece works in both, we adapt it rather than run it through a translator. One client runs four languages that way.

Yes, sometimes. We check before we start and tell you what we find, and if there is a real overlap we say so before you sign. If one comes up later, you hear it from us first.

We do work with more than one company in a category when they are not chasing the same buyers. Learnings, data and content never move between accounts.

The model is built for B2B first, SaaS especially, and it runs from funded scale-ups through Mittelstand and enterprise. We have deep working experience across HR tech, MedTech, ClimateTech, PropTech, Fintech / RegTech, and industrial B2B. Planeco Building is one example (PropTech / ClimateTech), where we 5x'd leads in about 10 months. We work across categories, but we are not generalists.

What we look for: a proven offer, real demand in your category, and assets worth surfacing. Proprietary data, technical depth, an underused video or research library, or a customer base with specific knowledge. If we have not worked an analogous market, we will say so in the first call rather than learn on your retainer.

Starting from zero is fine, and often the easier case: there is nothing to undo, and the first pages can be built the way they should have been built. Enter is the closest example we have. There was effectively no organic when we started, and it now runs more than 500 organic leads a month.

What is not fine is starting before you know who you serve, what you do better than the alternatives, and what outcomes you can stand behind. If those are still moving, you will burn budget on content that has to be rewritten. Fix positioning first and come back. We are happy to point you to people who do that work well.

A relaunch is not a reason to wait either. We would rather be in the room while the new site is being built than optimize it afterwards.

A Project ends when the deliverable ships. A Growth Partnership runs for twelve months with an opt-out after month six and a 30-day notice period afterwards. You keep the content, briefs, expert interview transcripts, and full access to your data, because none of it was ours to begin with. Our internal tooling stays with us, but we hand off documented playbooks so your team can keep running the work in any tool you choose.

Run the audit. It is free and gives you an honest read on your current SEO and AI visibility. If the read shows real room to move, book a 30-minute meeting and we will walk through it together. If it shows organic is not the bottleneck for you right now, we will tell you that too.